Skip to content
JudgeMate
Judging guide

Which table tennis format should your event use?

Any odd number of games is legal. The question is what each one costs you.

Last updated: August 3, 2026
Quick answer

Table tennis has two format decisions that get muddled into one. The match format is how long a single match is: ITTF 2.12.1 permits the best of any odd number of games, so best of 3, 5 and 7 are all fully sanctioned, and each game runs to 11 points with two clear at 10-all. The competition format is how many matches each entrant plays: knockout, round robin, or groups feeding a bracket. The two multiply. Best of five in a knockout of 32 is 31 matches of 20 to 30 minutes; best of three in eight groups of four is 48 matches of 12 to 18. Same field, same hall, wildly different day.

Choosing a table tennis format

  • ITTF 2.12.1 permits the best of any odd number of games — best of 3, 5 and 7 are all legal.
  • Every game runs to 11 points, and at 10-all it continues until someone leads by two (2.11.1).
  • Best of 3 buys roughly a third more matches per table than best of 5.
  • Individual events proper are knockout by regulation; groups belong to qualifying (3.7.4.4).
  • Team events use named systems — Swaythling (5 singles) or Corbillon (4 singles and a doubles).

Two decisions that get treated as one

Ask an organiser what format their tournament uses and the answer is usually a single word: knockout, or groups. That answers half the question. The other half — how long is one match — moves the schedule at least as much, and it is the half most people leave on the default.

Match format is the length of one contest: how many games, and to how many points. Competition format is how many contests each entrant plays: the shape of the draw. They multiply, and the product is your day.

The distinctive thing about table tennis is how much room the first decision has. Most racket sports fix the match length in the rulebook and let you vary only the draw. Table tennis fixes the game and leaves the number of games open.

Any odd number of games — the widest licence in racket sport

ITTF 2.12.1: a match shall consist of the best of any odd number of games. That is the whole rule. Not "best of five or seven", not "as specified by the organising committee" — any odd number.

The game itself is fixed. 2.11.1: a game is won by the first to 11 points, unless both reach 10, when the game goes to whoever first leads by two. There is no cap: 10-all can run to 15-13 if it wants, and the expedite system rather than a hard ceiling is what stops it running forever.

Match formatGames to winTypical lengthWhere it fits
Best of 116–10 minRotation events, club nights, huge fields
Best of 3212–18 minGroup stages, early rounds, one-evening tournaments
Best of 5320–30 minThe club standard and the ITTF individual default
Best of 7430–45 minFinals, team fixtures, matches worth the time

The useful consequence is that you can mix. Nothing in 2.12.1 says every round must use the same number of games. Groups at best of three, the bracket at best of five, the final at best of seven is a completely legal and very well-behaved shape: the early volume is cheap and the matches that matter get length.

JudgeMate offers 1, 2 or 3 games to win, which covers best of one, three and five. Best of seven would need a fourth value we do not currently offer — worth knowing before you promise it in the entry form.

TOP9
Set 4 · sets2 : 1
KON11
Live
Table Tennis · live scoreboard

Free table-tennis scoreboard.

Points and sets on the big screen, controlled from your phone.

Eleven points, and what happens if you change it

The sanctioned distance is 11 and has been since 2001, when the ITTF cut the game from 21. Alongside the distance, the service rotation changed: it moved from every five points to every two, and the single-point alternation from 20-all to 10-all (2.13.3).

JudgeMate lets you set 11, 15, 21 or 25 points per game. Only 11 is sanctioned today, so the longer distances are house formats and this guide will not pretend otherwise. What changed on 2 August 2026 is that they now behave coherently. Every threshold that depends on the distance moves with it:

Points per gameSingle-point service fromChange of ends in the deciding game
1110-all5
1514-all7
2120-all10
2524-all12

Before that fix, setting 21 gave you a game to 21 with the single-point service change still firing at 10-all — halfway through the game — and the change of ends still at 5. The scoreboard said 21 and played something else. It does not any more.

One thing that does not change with the distance is the service rotation itself. It stays at every two points at any distance. The pre-2001 game to 21 used every five, but that rule is withdrawn, and inventing a rotation no federation publishes would be worse than leaving the modern one in place.

Knockout, round robin, groups: the match counts

The competition format multiplies against whatever match length you chose.

ShapeMatchesMinimum per entrant
Knockout, n entriesn − 11
Knockout with consolation round, 32472
Round robin, n entriesn(n−1)/2n − 1
Groups of 4 (g groups)6g3
Groups of 4 → knockout6g + (2g − 1)3

A round robin grows quadratically and gets away from you fast: eight entries is 28 matches, twelve is 66, sixteen is 120. That growth is why groups exist. Eight groups of four cost 48 matches and give every entrant three, where a single round robin of 32 would cost 496.

What the regulations expect. ITTF 3.7.4.4 puts individual events proper on a knockout basis and reserves the group format for team events and for the qualifying rounds of individual events. A club tournament is not bound by that, but the shape it describes — groups to qualify, bracket to decide — is exactly the compromise most club organisers arrive at independently.

One ordering rule is worth borrowing verbatim. 3.7.5.5: the last match of a group should be between the players ranked first and second in the group when one qualifies, or second and third when two do. It costs nothing to arrange and it puts the decisive match at the end of the session rather than in the middle of it.

Team fixtures: Swaythling and Corbillon

Table tennis has the most developed team formats of any racket sport, and both are named in the regulations (ITTF 3.7.6).

Swaythling Cup system — best of five matches, five singles, three players per team. Order of play: A v X, B v Y, C v Z, A v Y, B v X.

Corbillon Cup system — best of five matches, four singles and one doubles, two to four players per team. Order of play: A v X, B v Y, doubles, A v Y, B v X.

Both stop as soon as one team reaches three wins, so a 3-0 fixture plays three matches and a 3-2 plays five. That is the property that makes them so schedulable: the ceiling is five matches and the floor is three.

What JudgeMate can and cannot do here, plainly. The draw treats a table tennis side as one player or one pair. It has no notion of a fixture that bundles several individual matches into one team result, so a Swaythling or Corbillon tie is not something the bracket will score for you. You can run every individual match on the platform and keep the team scoreline yourself, but the tie is not the unit the draw understands.

Choosing, with the hall clock in view

Work backwards from the hours you have. Tables times hours times the matches-per-hour rate for your chosen length is the number of matches your day can hold. Then find a shape that fits under it.

If you haveAnd you wantUse
One evening, 16 entries, 4 tablesEveryone plays several times4 groups of 4 at best of 3, then a knockout of 8
One day, 32 entries, 6 tablesA proper champion8 groups of 4 at best of 5, then a knockout of 16
One morning, 24 entries, 4 tablesA result before lunchKnockout of 32 with byes, best of 3, consolation round
A club night, 12 players, 3 tablesPlay, not administrationRotation format at one game to 11

The two levers that actually work when the day slips are shortening the match format and asking players to agree to expedite early. Adding tables mid-event never happens, and telling umpires to hurry does not survive contact with a close game.

The same 32 entries, three different days

Thirty-two entries, six tables, seven playing hours — 84 matches of capacity at best of five, or about 126 at best of three.

Day A: straight knockout, best of five. 31 matches. Finishes by early afternoon. Sixteen people play one match. The hall is half empty by 11:00 and you have used 37% of your capacity.

Day B: eight groups of four at best of five, knockout of 16 at best of five. 63 matches. Everyone plays at least three. Finishes about 16:30. Uses 75% of capacity, which is close to the right amount of slack.

Day C: eight groups of four at best of three, knockout of 16 at best of five, final at best of seven. Groups cost 48 short matches — roughly 14 minutes each, so about 11 table-hours against the 42 you have in the group phase alone. The groups finish before lunch. The bracket of 15 matches at best of five costs another 7 table-hours. You end up finishing an hour earlier than Day B with the same number of matches, and the final is longer rather than shorter.

Day C is what most experienced organisers converge on, and it comes from one sentence in 2.12.1: nothing requires every round to be the same length.

Table Tennis · live scoreboard

Count points and sets in table tennis — free.

Points and sets on the big screen. Control from your phone, share the score with fans. No sign-up.

Your phone
Controls
TOP
9+
KON
11+
TOP9
Set 4 · sets2 : 1
KON11
Live
No sign-upFreePhone → big screen
Reviewed by

JudgeMate Editorial Team

Editorial standards
Against

ITTF Statutes 2026 (consolidated), 2.11–2.15 and 3.7

Last reviewed 2026-08-03 · next March 2027

Frequently asked questions about table tennis formats

Primary Sources

  1. ITTF Statutes 2026 — Laws of Table Tennis (Chapter 2)International Table Tennis Federation
  2. ITTF Statutes 2026 — Regulations for International Competitions (3.4–3.7)International Table Tennis Federation

Related Guides

Ready to run your event?

Create a free event and let the scoring take care of itself.