Skip to content
Judging guide

How Is Scoring Decided at the 2026 Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championships?

Frankfurt, 12–16 August 2026 — the results, the D + A + E system, and the three ties that execution decided

Last updated: August 23, 2026
Quick answer

The 2026 Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championships (Festhalle Frankfurt, 12–16 August) ended with Darja Varfolomeev (GER) winning a third straight all-around title on 119.500 and Spain taking the group all-around on 57.450. Every routine was scored the same way: Difficulty (D) + Artistry (A) + Execution (E) − penalties. The D-score has no upper limit; the A-score and E-score each start at 10.0. Frankfurt needed the tie-break ladder three times, and all three ties were settled on the E-score — each time against the gymnast with more difficulty.

What Did Frankfurt 2026 Actually Score?

The 42nd Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championships closed in Frankfurt on 16 August 2026, and the official FIG results sheets verify every rule this guide describes. The sharpest confirmation is the tie-break ladder: it was needed three times in a single day of finals, and every time the gymnast with the higher D-score was the one who lost.

Darja Varfolomeev (GER) won her third straight individual all-around title on 119.500, 1.900 clear of Stiliana Nikolova (BUL) on 117.600, with Sofia Raffaeli (ITA) third on 117.550. The three medallists each secured an LA28 Olympic quota place for their National Olympic Committee.

The German's win is a lesson in how a cumulative total behaves. She ranked 14th of 18 on hoop, her opening apparatus, scoring 28.300 from a D of only 12.100 — and then won ball, clubs and ribbon outright. Her clubs routine carried a D of 14.500 (body difficulty 10.000 plus apparatus difficulty 4.500) for 31.500, and no routine in the four apparatus finals two days later beat it.

The margin between all-around silver and bronze was 0.050 — the exact size of a single penalty. Raffaeli's ball routine is recorded on the official sheet as 12.100 + 8.150 + 8.050 with a 0.05 in the penalty column, giving 28.250. Add that 0.05 back and she finishes level with Nikolova on 117.600, which is still not silver: a tie is broken on the higher E-score, and across the four apparatus Nikolova led 32.700 to 32.600. The penalty was the visible margin; execution was the real one.

Both individual ties in the apparatus finals were settled on E. In the clubs final Taisiia Onofriichuk (UKR) and Mariia Borisova finished level on 30.050, and Onofriichuk took silver on an E of 8.350 against 8.300 — even though Borisova had declared the higher difficulty, 13.500 to 13.400. In the ribbon final Borisova and Sofiia Ilteriakova finished level on 29.900, and Borisova took bronze on an E of 8.400 against 8.300 while Ilteriakova held the higher D by 0.300. Borisova and Ilteriakova appear on the official sheets under the neutral code WG2.

One tie ran to the second rung. In the group final for 3 hoops + 2 pairs of clubs — FIG's own name for the mixed set — Japan and Israel both scored 28.300 with identical E-scores of 7.200, so the ladder moved on to artistry and Japan took fourth on 8.000 against 7.700.

Spain won the group all-around on 57.450, ahead of Japan on 56.700 and Brazil on 55.500, with all three taking an LA28 group quota. The following day Brazil won both group apparatus finals, scoring 29.450 in each, while Spain placed fifth in the 5 balls final on 27.450. Brazil's two finals totalled 58.900 — 3.400 more than the two routines that had left them third in the all-around, and the clearest possible demonstration that qualification and all-around scores do not carry into a final.

FinalResultWhat Decided It
Individual all-aroundVarfolomeev (GER) 119.500, Nikolova (BUL) 117.600, Raffaeli (ITA) 117.550A 1.900 win built after she ranked 14th of 18 on her opening hoop
All-around silver0.050 between second and thirdExactly one 0.05 penalty; on a level total the E-sum decides, 32.700 to 32.600
Hoop finalOnofriichuk (UKR) 30.700Highest of the four apparatus finals, from a D of 14.100
Clubs finalNikolova (BUL) 30.150; silver and bronze tied on 30.050E-score 8.350 to 8.300 — the higher D of 13.500 lost
Ribbon finalVarfolomeev (GER) 30.500; bronze and fourth tied on 29.900E-score 8.400 to 8.300 — the higher D of 13.600 lost
Group all-aroundSpain 57.450, Japan 56.700, Brazil 55.500Brazil then won both group apparatus finals on 29.450 each

What Is Being Contested at Frankfurt 2026?

The 42nd Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championships were held from 12 to 16 August 2026 at the Festhalle Frankfurt in Germany, with roughly 300 gymnasts competing across individual and group events. Both format rules below held exactly: eighteen gymnasts contested the individual all-around final and eight each apparatus final.

The senior individual program awards five sets of medals: the all-around title plus four apparatus finalshoop, ball, clubs and ribbon. The all-around is its own final: the 18 best qualifiers (maximum two per country) turn all four apparatus again, and the ranking is the sum of those four scores.

The group program awards three sets of medals: the group all-around plus two apparatus finals. For the 2026 season the group configurations are 5 balls and a mixed set of 3 hoops + 4 clubs, with five gymnasts on the carpet at once.

Under the standard FIG format, only the top eight qualifiers advance to each apparatus final (a maximum of two gymnasts per country), so a strong nation can be forced to leave a genuine medal contender out of a final. Every final is a fresh routine — qualification scores do not carry over into the finals. The scoring machinery below is identical whether you are watching a hoop final or a group all-around.

Live results
1
LM
Lena Mazur
D 9.4 · E 8.9
14.300
2
NW
Nina Wójcik
D 9.1 · E 8.8
13.900
3
AK
Ada Kowal
D 8.9 · E 8.7
13.600
Rhythmic Gymnastics · live

Score a routine automatically.

D-score + E-score by the Code of Points — no calculator.

Create my free eventFree · Ready in 2 min

How Is Each Routine Scored? (D + A + E)

Every rhythmic gymnastics routine at the World Championships is built from three independent scores that are added together, then reduced by penalties: Final = D + A + E − penalties. This is the same framework explained in full in our rhythmic gymnastics scoring guide.

The Difficulty (D) score has no upper limit. It combines body difficulty — leaps, balances and rotations, the three scored body groups, at least one of each per routine — with apparatus difficulty, the throws, catches, rolls and exchanges that define each apparatus. A four-judge D-jury works in two pairs, one valuing the body and one the apparatus. Each judge first submits her own figure without consulting her partner; the pair then agrees a common value, and the final D is the common body score plus the common apparatus score.

The Artistry (A) score starts at 10.0 and loses value to artistry deductions taken in bands of 0.30, 0.60 or 1.00. The four A-judges are watching for character and a unifying style, body and facial expression, dynamic changes, effects, connections, rhythm and use of space — so an unbalanced use of the floor, a weak connection to the music, or a routine that crowds its hardest elements into one corner all cost real points. Four E-judges work the same way; on both panels the highest and lowest deductions are dropped and the remaining two averaged.

The Execution (E) score also starts at 10.0 and is cut for technique errors in bands of 0.10 small, 0.30 medium and 0.50 or more large — a bent knee, an under-rotated turn, an insufficient split. Losing the apparatus runs on a ladder rather than one flat figure: 0.50 if it is retrieved on the spot, 0.70 after one or two steps, 1.00 after three or more, 1.00 if it leaves the 13×13 m floor area at any distance, and 1.00 if it is never retrieved before the end. A fall with total loss of balance costs 0.70, and crossing the boundary line adds 0.30. Because D, A and E are separate, a routine can be extremely difficult yet still lose to a cleaner one.

ComponentStarts AtRewards
Difficulty (D)0 — no upper limitBody difficulty + apparatus difficulty
Artistry (A)10.0Character, expression, rhythm, use of space (minus faults)
Execution (E)10.0Clean technique + apparatus handling (minus faults)

Which Apparatus Are Used at the 2026 Worlds?

Rhythmic gymnastics is defined by its five apparatus, but the senior World Championships program does not use all five at once. In Frankfurt the senior individual gymnasts compete with hoop, ball, clubs and ribbon — the rope is no longer part of the senior individual program and now appears mainly at junior level.

Each apparatus rewards a different signature skill. The hoop is judged on rolls, passes of the body through the hoop, and high throws with rotation. The ball is the most fluid apparatus — it must rest on an open hand, never be gripped, and is scored on rolls along the body, bounces and spirals.

The clubs are used as a pair and demand two-handed coordination: mills, asymmetric throws where each club travels a different path, and catches of one club while the other is in the air. The ribbon — a 6-metre strip on a 50–60 cm stick — must stay in constant motion; any knot or tangle is an immediate deduction.

The group events use shared apparatus. For 2026 the two group sets are 5 balls (all five gymnasts on the same apparatus) and 3 hoops + 4 clubs (a mixed set). Group scoring adds a decisive extra element: exchanges — apparatus thrown between gymnasts — and the synchronisation of five bodies moving as one, which the E-judges scrutinise closely.

EventApparatusNote
Senior individualHoop · Ball · Clubs · RibbonRope not in the senior individual program
Group5 Balls · 3 Hoops + 4 ClubsExchanges + synchronisation scored

What Changed in the 2025-2028 Code of Points?

Frankfurt 2026 is contested under the FIG Code of Points 2025-2028, the rulebook that governs the current Olympic cycle toward LA 2028. The headline change is a deliberate rebalancing away from raw difficulty and back toward artistry.

The Code reduced the maximum number of difficulties counted in a routine. Instead of packing in as many high-value elements as physically possible, gymnasts now have fewer difficulty slots — which frees time and space for transitions, choreography and connection to the music.

Some body difficulties were removed or merged, discouraging repetitive element-farming and rewarding variety across the three scored body groups: leaps, balances and rotations. The intent, stated by FIG, is to make routines less of a difficulty sprint and more of a complete performance — and to reduce injury risk from over-loading extreme skills.

Crucially, the Artistry (A) score remains a separate, independent component worth up to 10.0, as it has been since the 2022-2024 cycle. What changed is its interior: there is no longer a split between a composition half and an artistic-mastery half, and every artistry fault now comes off a single 10.00 base in bands of 0.30, 0.60 or 1.00. This is what most distinguishes rhythmic gymnastics from artistic gymnastics, where artistry lives only inside execution deductions. In Frankfurt, expect the medal margins to be decided as much by musicality and clean lines as by who stacked the highest D-score.

How Are the Medals Decided — All-Around vs Apparatus Finals?

There are two different ways to win a medal in Frankfurt, and they use the same scores in different ways.

An apparatus final medal comes from a single routine. The eight finalists each perform once; the highest D + A + E − penalties total wins. Because it is one routine, a single dropped club or a stepped boundary line can swing the podium — there is no second score to average it out.

An all-around medal is a cumulative total. For a senior individual, the all-around is the sum of her four routines (hoop, ball, clubs, ribbon) in the all-around final, which the 18 best qualifiers reach; for a group it is the sum of the two group routines. Consistency matters more here — the all-around champion is rarely the gymnast with the single best routine, but the one who avoids a disaster across all of them.

Ties run down a fixed ladder: the higher E-score wins, then the higher A-score, then the higher D-score, summed over the four apparatus in the all-around and taken from the single routine in an apparatus final. If all three still match, the tie stands and the place is shared. Every score you see on the scoreboard is a live D + A + E calculation — exactly the kind of multi-panel scoring that platforms like JudgeMate are built to compute in real time. Frankfurt 2026 needed that ladder three times in one day of finals, and it never had to go past the second rung.

Worked Example: How a Ball-Final Medal Is Decided

Here is how one apparatus final can turn on execution rather than difficulty — a realistic ball-final scenario at the World Championships.

Gymnast A (clean routine):

  • Difficulty (D): 13.100
  • Artistry (A): 10.0 − 0.9 faults = 9.100
  • Execution (E): 10.0 − 1.1 faults = 8.900
  • Penalties: 0.000

Final = 13.100 + 9.100 + 8.900 − 0.000 = 31.100

Gymnast B (higher difficulty, but drops the ball):

  • Difficulty (D): 13.400
  • Artistry (A): 10.0 − 1.0 faults = 9.000
  • Execution (E): 10.0 − 1.1 ordinary faults − 0.7 for a ball retrieved after two steps = 8.200
  • Penalties: 0.000

Final = 13.400 + 9.000 + 8.200 − 0.000 = 30.600

Result: Gymnast A wins by 0.500, despite starting 0.300 lower in difficulty. Without the drop, Gymnast B's execution would have been 8.900, giving her 31.300 — enough for gold. The 0.7 loss deduction turned a projected 0.2 lead into a 0.5 loss. Had the ball rolled off the carpet instead, the deduction would have been 1.00 and the gap wider still.

(Note: elite individual apparatus scores at World level typically fall between about 28.0 and 32.0. The four apparatus finals at Frankfurt 2026 were won between 30.150 and 30.700, and the highest single routine of the championships' medal rounds was Varfolomeev's 31.500 on clubs in the all-around final. Exact D-values depend on the elements each gymnast declares under the 2025-2028 Code.)

Rhythmic Gymnastics · live

Adding D-score and E-score by hand? Leave it to the system.

Difficulty (D) and execution (E) summed automatically to the Code of Points. Judges enter marks, JudgeMate computes the final score.

Now: spreadsheet & calculator
D 9.20 E 8.75 − 0.30?
hoop 14.100 …
sum of 4 apparatus?
total 53.250 → ?
?!
Live classificationLivePts
1
LM
Lena Mazur
D 9.4 · E 8.9
14.300
2
NW
Nina Wójcik
D 9.1 · E 8.8
13.900
3
AK
Ada Kowal
D 8.9 · E 8.7
13.600
FreeNo cardReady in 2 min
Reviewed by

JudgeMate Editorial Team

Editorial standards
Against

FIG Code of Points Rhythmic Gymnastics 2025-2028; championships completed 16 August 2026

Last reviewed 2026-08-23 · next After the next FIG rhythmic technical update, and before the 2027 World Championships

FAQ

Primary Sources

  1. FIG Code of Points — Rhythmic Gymnastics 2025-2028FIG
  2. 2026 Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championships — Official Event Site (Frankfurt26)Deutscher Turner-Bund / FIG
  3. FIG Event Detail — Frankfurt am Main (GER), 2026 Rhythmic Gymnastics World ChampionshipsFIG
  4. 42nd Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championships — Individual All-Around Final, official resultsFIG / USA Gymnastics
  5. 42nd Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championships — Individual Apparatus Finals, official resultsFIG / USA Gymnastics
  6. 42nd Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championships — Group Apparatus Finals, official resultsFIG / USA Gymnastics
  7. Spain take the group all-around world title and an LA28 quota in FrankfurtOlympics.com

Related Guides

Ready to run your event?

Create a free event and let the scoring take care of itself.