Skip to content

Free Dance Competition Software

What runs at zero, and where zero stops

Last updated: August 22, 2026

Three things run a dance competition at no licence cost: JudgeMate (free for organizers at any size, with three dance scoring engines), CompMngr (free under an entry cap, then per competition day), and a spreadsheet. The spreadsheet is the one that deserves a warning. Ordinal scrutineering is not arithmetic you can eyeball — the Skating System's rule 7 sums only the marks that form the majority, not all of a couple's marks, and getting that wrong produces a protocol that looks finished and names the wrong winner.

What free actually means, per tool

“Free” hides several different arrangements. This table separates them.

What free actually means, per tool
PlatformFocusPricing modelKnown rateFree tier
JudgeMateThree dance engines, plus every other sportFree for organizersNo entry cap, no per-event credits, no commissionYes, unlimited
CompMngrBallroom competition managementFree below a cap, then per dayFree up to 250 entries; $350 first day above it (read Aug 2026)Yes, entry-capped
SpreadsheetWhatever you buildNo licence costZero — the cost is your time and the errorsYes, in the narrow sense
O2CMEntries and resultsPer entry$0.30 per entry (read Aug 2026)No
danceitIDO and WADF systemsLicenceVolume discount for high-frequency venuesNo
TopTurnierWDSF-certified scrutineeringLicence plus weekend rental€475 full edition; €24 per sheet per weekend (read Aug 2026)No

How we read the word free

A tool is listed as free only if you can run a real competition on it without paying — not if it offers a trial, and not if the free tier stops at a size real events exceed. Where a cap exists we give the number, because a cap is the whole story of a free tier.

We also count what free costs elsewhere. A spreadsheet has no licence fee and a very real price in scrutineering errors and hours. A capped tier is free until your event grows, and events grow. Neither of those is a criticism — they are just the part of the price that does not appear on the invoice.

JudgeMate — free with no cap

Free for organizers regardless of entry count, across every sport in the catalogue. For dance that includes all three scoring engines: absolute points with deductions and award levels, ordinal placement under the Skating System with rules 1 to 11, and battles decided by judge votes on a knockout bracket.

Also included at no cost: entry formats from solo to club, so a pair or a formation is one entry with one number; rounds as linked categories with carry-over; club and cross-category rankings; live public results; a jumbotron view for a LED screen; PDF and CSV export.

Where free stops: we are not WDSF-certified, so sanctioned dancesport is out of scope no matter what it costs. We also do not do per-judge analytics or video replay. Those are real limits, and they are not a pricing question.

A spreadsheet — and the specific way it fails

For a small absolute-scoring event a spreadsheet genuinely works: sum the criteria, average the panel, sort descending. Plenty of good competitions have run that way.

Ordinal scrutineering is a different matter, and this is the part worth reading carefully. The Skating System does not average anything. A couple takes the lowest place at which a majority of adjudicators placed them at that place or better. When two couples reach that majority in the same column, rule 6 compares how many marks each has there. If they are still level, rule 7 compares the sum of the marks that form the majority — not the sum of every mark the couple received.

That distinction is the single most common error in hand scrutineering, and it is invisible: the spreadsheet returns a number, the protocol prints, and nothing looks wrong. It simply names a different winner than the rules do.

The summary rules add more of the same. A shared place is written as a fraction, and that fraction is read differently depending on the operation — 2½ counts as third when counting places and enters as 2.5 when adding them. A formula that treats it one way throughout is wrong half the time.

If you want to check your own arithmetic, our Skating System calculator runs rules 5 to 11 and labels every position with the rule that produced it.

CompMngr — free under the cap

Free up to 250 entries, which covers a genuine first competition rather than a demo. Above that it charges per competition day with modules on top.

The cap is the thing to plan around. A club competition that grows past 250 entries crosses into paid pricing mid-life, and that is a budgeting question rather than a migration one — the tool is the same on both sides of the line.

Worth knowing: CompMngr publishes a documented arrangement for its source code to be released by the executors of its author's estate. In a market where several tools depend on very few people, that is a serious answer to a serious risk.

Decision tree

Pick by what your event actually needs at zero cost:

Decision tree
If you runPick
Any dance competition, any size, outside WDSF sanctionJudgeMate
A first ballroom competition under 250 entriesCompMngr free tier
A small absolute-scored event you already have a working sheet forA spreadsheet
Anything scored by places rather than pointsNot a spreadsheet — rule 7 is where it breaks
A WDSF-sanctioned competitionCertified software; free is not an option here

Try JudgeMate on your next event

A dancesport event takes about 10 minutes to configure. No athlete limits, no commission on registrations. See dancesport features · Dancesport glossary

Try JudgeMate Free

See also

Reviewed by

JudgeMate Editorial Team

Editorial standards
Against

Pricing read August 2026; Skating System rules 5–11 as published in federation worked examples

Last reviewed 2026-08-22

Common questions

Sources

  1. CompMngr — pricing — CompMngr
  2. O2CM — organizer information — O2CM
  3. TopTurnier — editions and licensing — TopTurnier
  4. danceit — competition system — danceit