How Was the Enhanced Games Timed and Officiated?
Electronic timing, photo finishes, false starts, and what was missing
Last updated: May 26, 2026
Sanctioned swimming and track use certified electronic timing. Touchpads stop the swimming clock to 0.01 second, and a photo-finish camera reads sprint times to 0.001. A reaction under 0.100 second counts as a false start. The Enhanced Games published no timing certification, and the clock behind Gkolomeev's 20.81 swim was publicly questioned, so its times cannot be independently verified.
How is swimming timed electronically?
Sanctioned swimming uses Automatic Officiating Equipment. A starting signal begins the clock, and a touchpad at the wall stops it when the swimmer touches at the finish. The result reads to 0.01 second, the smallest unit a swimming record recognizes.
The touchpad removes the lag and bias of a human thumb on a stopwatch. Backup buttons operated by timekeepers and a video record sit behind the pad in case it fails, so every final time has a verifiable source.
World Aquatics approves the equipment and the install before a meet can produce records. The certification is the point: a time is only as trustworthy as the system that measured it. How that time then clears the rest of the record rules is covered in are the Enhanced Games records real.
How is a 100m sprint timed and decided?
Track sprints use Fully Automatic Timing linked to a photo-finish camera aimed down the finish line. The camera scans the line thousands of times per second and builds a single image in which time runs left to right.
A runner's time is taken when the torso reaches the line, not the head, arm, or leg. Officials read the image to 0.001 second to separate places, then round the official time up to the next 0.01. This is why two sprinters can share a posted time yet still finish first and second.
The start is electronic too. The gun signal and the camera share one clock, so the recorded time begins at the exact instant of the start. Without that shared clock, a time means little, which is the heart of the question raised about Las Vegas.
How are false starts and legal conditions checked?
Starting blocks carry force sensors. World Athletics fixes the minimum legal reaction at 0.100 second; a push against the block faster than that is ruled a false start, because no human can react to sound that quickly. Since 2010, a single false start means immediate disqualification at championship level.
Sprint and jump records also need a legal wind. A following wind over +2.0 m/s makes a performance ineligible for record purposes, measured by a gauge at the track. These checks are part of why a record is a status, not just a number.
These systems are standardized so results compare across meets and years. Strip them away and a fast time becomes an isolated claim that no one else can reproduce or verify.
Was the Enhanced Games timing reliable?
The organizers did not publish timing certification for the event. For a meet selling itself on record times, the measurement chain was never opened for independent checking.
The swimming outlet SwimSwam publicly questioned whether the displayed clock was synchronized with the video for Gkolomeev's 20.81 in the 50m freestyle, noting the clock appeared to stop before he reached the wall. That is a reported concern, not a proven error, but it is exactly the kind of doubt that certification exists to remove.
The sprint told its own story. Fred Kerley won the 100m in 9.97 seconds while competing clean, slower than his lifetime best and far from the world record, as ESPN reported. A credible time needs a verifiable clock behind it, whatever the number says.
Why does certified, disclosed timing matter?
A result is only as good as the proof behind it. Certified equipment, a shared start clock, backup systems, and published procedures let anyone reconstruct how a time was measured. Take them away and the audience is asked to trust a screen.
This is the same principle that governs judged sports, where the score replaces the clock. The standard is a clear record of each input and a result that can be reviewed afterwards.
JudgeMate does not time races. For the judged and club events it serves, it records each score with a timestamp and recalculates standings server-side against the event's published criteria, so an organizer can show how a result was reached. For the wider picture, see our sports integrity hub and the weightlifting judging guide.
Worked example: how a photo finish separates two sprinters
Two runners finish a 100m almost together. The photo-finish image decides the order.
1 — The camera read. Runner A's torso reaches the line at 9.971 seconds; Runner B's at 9.974. The camera scans the line thousands of times per second, so the 0.003 gap is clear.
2 — Ranking. Read to 0.001, Runner A finishes first, Runner B second. The torso, not the arm or leg, sets each time.
3 — Official times. Each time rounds up to the next 0.01. Both 9.971 and 9.974 post as 9.98.
Result: the scoreboard shows 9.98 for both, yet A is ranked ahead of B. The thousandth-second read separates them; the certified, shared start clock is what makes either number trustworthy in the first place.
Ready to score competitions professionally?
JudgeMate is a free sports competition platform that handles scoring calculations automatically. Explore JudgeMate features for organizers
FAQ
Primary Sources
- World Aquatics Competition Regulations (Automatic Officiating Equipment, touchpads) — World Aquatics
- World Athletics Technical Rules (Book C — timing, photo finish, false starts, wind) — World Athletics
- Was the Enhanced Games clock synced properly for Gkolomeev's 20.81? — SwimSwam
- Fred Kerley runs 100 meters in 9.97 seconds at the Enhanced Games — ESPN
Related Guides
Try JudgeMate Free
Digital scoring platform for every sport on the platform.