IFSC Scoring 2025 Explained

Before 2025, IFSC bouldering used a tops/zones/attempts hierarchy: most tops first, ties broken by most zones, then by fewest attempts. The system worked but produced ranking results that were hard to communicate to broadcasters and fans — "this athlete won by attempts" required explanation.

The 25/10/-0.1 system replaces the hierarchy with a single number per athlete:

• 25 points per top
• 10 points per zone (when no top on that boulder)
• -0.1 point per failed attempt before the result

A single number sums across all boulders in the round. Athletes can be ranked by total points immediately, no hierarchy interpretation needed. The format applies to qualification, semi-final, and final rounds with the same scoring math.

Athlete A in a 4-boulder qualification round:

• Boulder 1: Top in 1 attempt (flash) → 25.0 points
• Boulder 2: Top in 3 attempts → 25 - 0.2 = 24.8 points
• Boulder 3: Zone in 2 attempts, no top → 10 - 0.1 = 9.9 points
• Boulder 4: No zone, no top → 0 points

Total: 59.7 points.

Athlete B in the same round:

• Boulder 1: Top in 4 attempts → 25 - 0.3 = 24.7 points
• Boulder 2: Top in 1 attempt (flash) → 25.0 points
• Boulder 3: Top in 5 attempts → 25 - 0.4 = 24.6 points
• Boulder 4: Zone in 1 attempt, no top → 10.0 points

Total: 84.3 points. Athlete B advances higher in qualification despite Athlete A having a flash, because Athlete B topped 3 boulders to A's 2.

When two athletes have identical totals after a round, IFSC tie-breakers apply in order:

1. Prior round ranking — semi-final ranking decides ties in the final; qualification ranking decides ties in the semi-final.
2. Countback — best individual boulder score across all boulders, then second-best, etc., until the tie breaks.
3. Number of tops — only used if countback also ties.

The IFSC has historically broken ties with countback rarely; the prior round ranking handles most cases. For a final ranking tie at the medal positions, the IFSC may award shared medals if the countback also ties, depending on the event's specific rules.

JudgeMate calculator does not implement tie-breakers — it gives the raw score. For real events, tie-break logic runs in the federation scoring system.

Local organizers can adopt IFSC 25/10/-0.1 scoring without IFSC sanctioning. Two paths:

• Strict IFSC mode — circuit format with judges at every problem, isolation rounds (or partial isolation), and full attempt counting. Best for national qualifiers and youth championships preparing athletes for IFSC events.
• Adapted scoring — set static IFSC-style point values (Top=25, Zone=10, Flash=15) per boulder in a scramble with in-app self-reporting. Athletes tap their result on each numbered boulder; the server sums the configured points.

JudgeMate handles the static-points adaptation today: configure the event with IFSC-style point values per boulder and the server calculates totals automatically. Native enforcement of the per-attempt -0.1 deduction is on the roadmap; until it lands, the formula is approximated by static point values rather than dynamic attempt counting. For full sanctioning that affects IFSC rankings, the federation product (Vertical-Life) is required — local adoption of the formula does not produce official ranking points.